Mercantilism
Mercantilism, sometimes called ‘economic nationalism, was a
prevalent economic doctrine in the Europe more specifically in the Western
Europe around 1500 to 1800. This view postulates that economics should be subordinated
to politics as market emerges within a social context shaped by the state
power. The strategy of mercantilism emphasized the state regulation of the economy and
international trade by increasing exports and keeping imports low. They
believed that state’s power, wealth and prestige could be achieved through
favorable trade surplus. It was a time of Gold Standard so countries were paid
with the gold. More Gold was a sign of prestige so, states with more precious
metals were considered more powerful and wealthy. Economic wealth, according to
mercantilism, could be transformed into military might later on. Mercantilists imposed tariffs, duties and subsidies on imports to support their nascent
domestic industries. They demanded governments to make protectionism a central
part of government policy. However, aggressive mercantilism went even one step
ahead and aspired to make economy stronger by expansion. This type of mercantilism
inspired states to pursue the policies of imperialism and colonialism. Colonies
served two purposes to the master: first it was a bigger market for the manufactured
goods, second colonies provided the required raw material in cheap prices. Due to
industrialization and capitalism, domestic production capacity increased and
states started producing consumer goods on massive scales which later on were
exported to colonies.
Great powers like England, Holland, France and Spain competed
each other on the economic and military fronts. These powers were in search of
new colonies which could secure their business interests.
The End of Mercantilism
Mercantilism started to decline in the eighteenth century. When
Liberal economists like Adam Smith and David Ricardo proposed the concepts of economic
liberalism in the form of laissez-faire, free market, specialization and
comparative advantage. They argued that international trade is rather a mutual
gain than zero-sum game. Adam Smith in his 1776 book ‘The wealth of Nations’
debated that politics and economics exist ideally in separate spheres. He further assumed that free market has an ‘invisible hand’ in the shape of the laws of
the demand and supply and price mechanism which will contribute to economic growth and general individual welfare in the long run. Market with less state intervention has self-regulating mehcanism. Therefore, economic liberalists negated the
state regulation of market. It emerged in reaction to the mercantilism. It was
a heavy blow on the mercantilist polices.
Naveed Qamar.
MSc International Relations
Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.
M.Phil Scholar, Researcher, Writer.
If you have any question or suggestion, leave it in the comment box. I will appreciate.
ReplyDeleteTrade war between China and US is one the manifestations of mercantilism.
DeleteRight. Trump imposed substitute duties on Chinese goods to encourage its domestic production.
Deletegood work sir keep it up.
ReplyDeleteQuality write up. Good job sir Naveed..
ReplyDeleteSir, doesn't mercantilism exist today? American belief of America first in taking oil from foreign lands specifically from Third World countries is a sign of protectionist policy. And economic liberalism is also one of the forms of Neo-imperialism to capture markets in an indirect means. Don't we still live in a same times of 15th and 18th centuries with only changing our patterns of exploitation?
ReplyDeleteThat is a Neo-mercantilism. Trade war between United States and China is part of it.
DeleteNeo-mercantilism is trade war in 21th century between USA and China. It is assumed that this Neo-mercantilism war will be fought and won by China, as a nation, as a modern economic state and a new deplomatic power in and around the world. Economically, politically, depolmatically USA is not in position to control even manage the Neo-mercantilism in the world.
ReplyDelete